Last Week I shared Why Mutual Funds Are Better Than Stocks? and in response to that post I got many emails saying that they do not see any difference in either of them and this is the story of most of us including me.
Last Week I shared Why Mutual Funds Are Better Than Stocks? and in response to that post I got many emails saying that they do not see any difference in either of them and this is the story of most of us including me.
So today I would like to ask you which one works for you and what is the main reason for it to work?
Loading ...If you are Voting for Either there is no harm in it but it actually mean that you should start tracking your investment more closely from today.
My Answer is Mutual Funds and the main reason why mutual funds work for me is because I am at times too busy on my Other Websites and blogs and so could not work or track on my investments.
Mutual funds are better for people who do not have time to follow market closely and for people with medium risk (like me).
I agree with above comments. Mutual fund is good than stock. But if we study well about stock market. Nothing is better thank stock.
In Mutual Funds using SIP you can average your investments but not in the case of Stocks. Investing in stocks is like lump sum investment in a MF which carries more risks.
But if there would have been a option for investing in stocks through SIP then they would give the best returns.
Yes, mutual funds are better than stocks because in mutual funds risk is devided in all mutual holders.
Hey dis is D.Rangababu. Mutal funds permanent return.
High rate of interest
Safety & security.
we can take when we want.
All companies r going to mutal funds.
mutal funds collect capital money
I want to invest some amount in an Open ended Hybrid fund NFO. Axis Bank Triple advantage fund. It will invest in Equity, Debt instruments and Gold ETF’s. I have been advised by a broker who handles the portfolio of the COmpany in which I work, that Axis is a new Fund house, the corpus is low, and also the one should avoid NFO’s as there are no track records to compare to. Does the argument hold true. Reading at the offer document I feel I may invest in the NFO. KINDLY SUGGEST.
Neha, He is very right. We have more funds which can be a good substitute of NFO’s and track record is a good way to judge the fund.
Actualy mutual funds are the instruments created to enable finacial institutions & corporate bodies collect capital money without paying commercial interest. They dont commit return appreciation and as well do not provide better appreciation to highly unorganised common man invester. Perhaps these have come under a conspiracy between governing establishmnt and corporates.What ever SEBI is doing in perfectly OK. Mutual funds run by private corporates must be closed.